The default font size and transparency settings are more difficult to read than past versions I've used of this software. I haven't tried to adjust them myself yet, but I shouldn't feel like I need to. Otherwise, this start menu is much better than t

EVN , 09.10.2012, 19:28

Idea status: under consideration

Comments

John Harrison, 22.06.2013, 02:02

I don't like the transparency. I first used the Vista Start Menu program for Windows SP. It had a solid background which I like. The menu test is difficult to read because of the icons and whatever coming through and interfering with being able to clearly read the information. I really liked the Vista Start Menu (Free Version) and I got your new paid version because of the groups function. Taking a small step backwards would be an improvement in my opinion and easier on a lot of eyes.

Ed, 21.12.2013, 06:36

Totally agree with John Harrison above, I don't like the transparency. Would like it solid so the background does not "bleed through."

Without registration

Name		Required
e-mail		Required

Login		Use 3 to 18 characters, Latin characters or numbers	This login is not availableThis login is available
e-mail
Password		Use 3 to 18 characters, Latin characters or numbers
Re-type password
	Remember me

	Sign up


E-mail

The default font size and transparency settings are more difficult to read than past versions I've used of this software. I haven't tried to adjust them myself yet, but I shouldn't feel like I need to. Otherwise, this start menu is much better than t

Comments

Leave a comment